Skip to content
Working proposal for partner review

Fund the people already creating safer communities.

This page shows the wage assumptions, employer expenses, positions, hours and arithmetic openly — so a practitioner can see how a proposed rate was reached, and a funder can question an assumption without reverse-engineering a model.

Not awarded, not approved, and not a commitment from any named partner or funder. Rates, employment structure and benefits would be finalized through implementation agreements, budget review and applicable employment requirements.

Current source model · the proposal being revised

$15M / 3 years

The structure the current proposal sets out. It is being revised in a separate workstream, and the arithmetic further down this page is part of why.

$10M

Practitioner Workforce Fund

$1.5M

Training, Certification & Learning

$500K

Volunteer & Emerging-Practitioner Pathways

$1M

Community Innovation & Organizational Stabilization

$1.5M

Resilient Infrastructure, Measurement, Communications & Stewardship

$500K

Independent Evaluation & Fund Administration

Inside the $10M Practitioner Workforce Fund

$8.25M
Pay + employment benefits / equivalents

What people earn for doing the work, plus the cost of employing them.

$1M
Supervision + quality support

Reflective supervision, process consultation, specialist support, peer learning and quality development.

$750K
Host / employer / field support

Payroll administration, insurance, workspace, equipment, transportation, communications and the organizational support needed to employ people responsibly.

Working community allocation example

One possible three-year community practice budget.

Where would the people actually be? This is the same question the source model asks by practitioner-year category, pictured instead as places and teams in Fresno.

$1M
Elder justice

Elder Justice Fresno

Elder justice practitioners, family support, advocacy, navigation, education, community response, and restorative options where safe and voluntary.

$1M
Southwest Fresno hubs + practitioners

Southwest Fresno

Neighborhood practitioners, community mediation, restorative practice, violence intervention, trusted messengers, local access, and hub staffing.

$2M
CJC hubs + practitioners

Community Justice Center

Community mediators, restorative facilitators, CJN PeaceMakers, additional neighborhood hubs, citywide practitioner support, shared practice capacity, and supervision.

$2M
Schools

School sites

School restorative practitioners, climate staff, peer mediation, reentry conferences, youth leadership, family engagement, staff support, and conflict response.

$1M
Victim services coordination

RCS / victim services

Victim-centered coordination, advocacy, referral pathways, community education, response support, and cross-system connection.

$1M
Rural access

Rural Fresno County

Rural practitioners, community access points, mediation, trusted local connectors, field access and transportation, regional coordination, and hubs where useful.

$1M
Community practitioner case pool

Approved community practitioners

Modest case-based payment for approved community practitioners doing documented work, so trained people can practice without a full-time post.

$1M
Hub leadership + supervision

Across the system

Hub leads, practice supervisors, mentors, specialist consultation, project leadership, training, quality support, and flexible implementation needs.

Total

$10,000,000

over three years

This example shows how a practitioner-focused investment could translate into real Fresno capacity. Final allocations would require partner agreement, governance, scope, readiness and funding. It is not an award, an approved allocation, a contract, or a commitment by any named organization.

This is a new planning example, not the source proposal’s practitioner-year split. The two have not been reconciled — that is work for the proposal itself, not for this page.

Illustrative hub team · not a required staffing pattern

What a community hub team could look like.

1
Hub lead

Coordination, relationships, supervision, and local partnership development.

2
Senior practitioners

Mediation, restorative processes, mentoring, and more complex matters.

4
Community practitioners

Mediation, preparation, response, outreach, and follow-through.

+
Community case practitioner pool

Approved practitioners taking individual matters, paid per case.

+
Training / travel / field support

The practical costs that let people take part at all.

+
Supervision / consultation

Reflective supervision, specialist help, and quality support.

More than one way to take part

Not every trained practitioner needs a full-time post.

A healthy community-practice system can combine full-time and part-time roles, hub and school-site positions, specialists, supervisors, practitioners paid per case, and volunteer-to-paid pathways — so capacity can grow without forcing everyone into the same employment model.

Hub lead
A regular paid role.
Senior practitioner
A regular or part-time role.
Community practitioner
A regular or part-time role.
Approved community practitioner
May take part through individual paid cases, without a salaried post.

Community practitioner case payment

Paid for responsible practice, not for a particular result.

Approved community practitioners may receive modest case-based compensation for documented work. A matter pays one of the two amounts below.

Standard matter

$100

When an approved community practitioner accepts and works the matter.

or

Completed process · total

$150

When a matter advances through the fuller process to an appropriate completed endpoint.

$150 is the total for that matter, not an addition to the $100. A practitioner receives one amount or the other.

A completed endpoint can be

  • An agreement is reached
  • No agreement is reached after the process
  • The process is appropriately concluded
  • A participant declines after meaningful preparation
  • Another legitimate closing outcome

Completion does not require an agreement.

Payment compensates

  • Time
  • Preparation
  • Response
  • Documentation
  • Follow-through
  • Process completion

Payment never rewards

  • Reaching an agreement
  • An admission
  • A particular participant decision
  • A specific punitive outcome
  • Any preferred case result

No payment should ever depend on producing an agreement.

Mathematical example only

A blended $1,000,000 pool could support thousands of practitioner case payments, depending on the mix. If it were entirely one kind, it would be about 10,000 standard payments or about 6,666 completed-process payments — it will not be all one kind, and no volume is being committed to.

New planning assumption · working compensation framework

What a practitioner would be paid.

Planning rates for discussion. Not existing employment contracts and not guaranteed wages. Annual equivalents assume 2,080 hours — 40 hours across 52 weeks.

$35/hr
Entry practitioner

1 year

$72,800 / year base
$94,640 employer cost

$40/hr
Developing practitioner

3 years

$83,200 / year base
$108,160 employer cost

$50/hr
Experienced practitioner

5 years

$104,000 / year base
$135,200 employer cost

$65/hr
Senior practitioner

10 years

$135,200 / year base
$175,760 employer cost

$80/hr
Advanced practitioner / mentor

15+ years

$166,400 / year base
$216,320 employer cost

$125/hr
Up to $125/hour

Leadership, specialist, consultation or project-direction time

$162.50/hr employer cost
Not assumed to be a full-time position

Years are a guidepost, not a gate

Nobody becomes valuable only after sitting in a job for a set number of years. The 1 / 3 / 5 / 10 / 15+ structure exists to make the scale readable. Placement can also reflect:

  • Practice competence
  • Training
  • Certification
  • Scope of responsibility
  • Complexity
  • Supervision responsibility
  • Lived experience
  • Cultural knowledge
  • Community trust
  • Language
  • Relationship capital
  • Demonstrated field experience

Illustrative employment expense · 30%

An hourly wage is not what it costs to employ someone. A flat 30% is used here to make that concept visible. It is not a benefits guarantee and not an actuarial or tax calculation.

  • Employer payroll taxes
  • Health / retirement contributions where offered
  • Workers compensation
  • Unemployment costs
  • Paid leave
  • Payroll / HR administration
  • Employment-related overhead

$35$45.50

$40$52

$50$65

$65$84.50

$80$104

$125$162.50

Math check

The new wage floor does not fit the old practitioner-year target.

This is worth saying plainly rather than quietly reconciling. The source proposal targets 120 practitioner-years against an $8.25M compensation envelope. At the proposed $35/hour entry floor, that does not add up.

  1. $35/hour × 2,080 hours$72,800 base wages per FTE-year
  2. + 30% illustrative employment expense≈ $94,640 employer cost per FTE-year
  3. × 120 practitioner-years≈ $11,356,800

That is before the separately allocated $1M supervision and quality allocation and $750K host and field allocation.

The current $10M / 120-practitioner-year model does not fit the $35/hour floor as currently structured.

What the envelope supports at the floor

87FTE practitioner-years

$8.25M at ≈ $94,640 fully loaded, if everyone were paid at the entry floor. A real mix with $40, $50, $65 and $80 roles would support fewer. A planning illustration, not a new target.

Decisions this opens — for CJC, not for this page

  • Increase the workforce capitalization
  • Reduce the practitioner-year target
  • Change the mix of roles and hours
  • Revise other allocations
  • Redesign the employment model

This is exactly why the planning numbers are under review.

Worked examples

Position, hours, rate, math, result.

Full-time entry practitioner

40 hrs / week
× $35 / hour
× 52 weeks

$72,800wages

$94,640 employer cost

With the illustrative 30% employment expense, before separately allocated supervision and host support where applicable.

Half-time entry practitioner

20 hrs / week
× $35 / hour
× 52 weeks

$36,400wages

$47,320 employer cost

With the illustrative 30% employment expense, before separately allocated supervision and host support where applicable.

20-hour experienced practitioner

20 hrs / week
× $50 / hour
× 52 weeks

$52,000wages

$67,600 employer cost

With the illustrative 30% employment expense, before separately allocated supervision and host support where applicable.

Pay for all of the work

Pay for the work around the session, not only the session.

A budget that pays only for the meeting quietly asks someone to donate everything that makes the meeting possible.

Direct practice

Mediation, restorative process, intervention, meeting, circle.

Preparation

Separate conversations, readiness, safety planning, process design.

Documentation

Notes, agreements, reporting.

Coordination

Partner calls, scheduling, referrals, handoffs.

Follow-through

Check-ins, commitments, agreement support.

Supervision / consultation

Reflective supervision, quality support, specialist consultation.

Travel / field time

Where required by the role.

Learning / training

When part of the paid role.

Current source model · old illustrative distribution

What kinds of work are we trying to resource?

Because the compensation model changes the overall arithmetic, treat these as a description of the work rather than funded positions. No organization has been awarded a number of positions or an amount of money.

40 practitioner-years

Community mediation + restorative facilitation

25 practitioner-years

Schools + school climate

20 practitioner-years

Youth intervention / credible messengers

15 practitioner-years

Reentry / reintegration

10 practitioner-years

Elder justice / victim advocacy / family stabilization

10 practitioner-years

Community organizers / trainers / network support

CJC / CJN PeaceMakers

  • Community mediators
  • Restorative facilitators
  • Preparation
  • Conferences
  • Circles
  • Agreements
  • Follow-through

Schools

  • School restorative practitioners
  • Climate coordinators
  • Reentry conferences
  • Peer mediation
  • Youth leadership
  • Staff and family support

Community hubs

  • Community mediators
  • Credible messengers
  • Youth interventionists
  • Trusted connectors
  • Local office hours
  • Neighborhood access

ARC / reentry

  • Reintegration
  • Accountability
  • Family preparation
  • Community connection
  • Follow-through

EASI / Elder Justice Fresno

  • Elder safety
  • Education
  • Advocacy
  • Navigation
  • Family stabilization
  • Restorative options where safe and voluntary

Training / community capacity

  • Academy
  • Trainers
  • Practitioner development
  • Supervision
  • Volunteer-to-paid pathways
  • Community learning

Local public-service context

People doing difficult community work should not be treated as cheap labor by default.

These professions are not equivalent to community-justice practice and are not being claimed as such. They are here so the scale of the proposed rates can be read against published local pay.

City of Fresno police officer recruit

$6,760–$7,097 / month

≈ $81,120–$85,164 / year

City of Fresno police officer, lateral

$7,451–$9,990 / month

≈ $89,412–$119,880 / year

Fresno Unified elementary teacher

2026–27 salary range

≈ $62,302–$110,898 / year

Local community health system RN

≈ $43.97–$59.74 / hour

Published local postings

Local RN leadership (charge / assistant manager / manager)

≈ $54.54–$100.72 / hour

Published local postings

Context only. Work year, education, licensure, overtime, retirement, benefits and job responsibilities differ substantially between these roles. Published local pay context, reviewed September 2026.